Mapquest, revenge, and “Finlandia” II

 ~~ Sunday Evening Ruminations, Part Two
 

Astonishing, when you think about it, in a society where we make such a fuss over The Golden Rule, and where the majority of folks are Christians who can quote you Jesus' admonition to "turn the other cheek," how utterly committed we are to the idea of revenge.

We don't even think about it, usually. Getting back at someone who has wronged you, evening up the score, teaching them a lesson; it's the default response.

No matter what warm and fuzzy things we're saying in church and teaching our children when we're doing so deliberately, the minute we turn our backs almost every television show and movie is preaching the gospel of revenge. Seriously. Take a piece of scratch paper and a pencil and watch an evening of network television and see how many revenge motifs you count. It will blow your mind.

So it's not surprising, I suppose, that as I contemplated the appropriate way to formally end this relationship, revenge crossed my mind.

My former minister (that's what makes this story particularly delicious, I think) shared with me a pocket-daydream/revenge fantasy of hers that always cheered her up enough to drop whatever snarkiness was going through her mind: hitting her ex-husband over the head with a grain shovel, complete with a full-fledged Wile.E.Coyote-type sound effect – kuh-WONNNGGGG!

Of course, let's be frank; I don't really have much to revenge. OK, I got an email that I perceived was unnecessarily hostile/rude and really did, as far as I could tell, come out of nowhere. Between commas, it managed to defame the Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy amendment; the arts; the Guthrie; the city of my residence; my blogs (including the one just named by one Perceptive Soul as one of the Top Ten Best in the country); my friend's radio show; and my behavior two days earlier (I asked him to pull over to the side of the road so I could photograph an eagle. OK, I kinda flipped out over it, but still …). But once I decoded the sentence "…Not to mention, the screaming eagle incident, when which I was very much ready to send you on your own way.... If you only knew, how much I did NOT care for your behavior in the slightest!" I have to admit, I got pissed and started contemplating ways to "get him back."

But the trouble with rumination (defined, [weirdly enough, by Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary] as "obsessive or abnormal reflection upon an idea or deliberation over a choice") is that your brain doesn't know when to quit. After I'd written and discarded a baker's dozen of Snotty Emails, drafted and performed at least three Dramatic Kiss-Off Monologues, and outlined at least four Devastate-Him-Utterly-And-Leave-Him-Desperate-To-Get-Me -Back phone calls, I was left scraping the bottom of the revenge-barrel for something to chew on.

For example: even if I did deliver one of these carefully crafted messages; what did I want to happen? OK, I was hurt and wanted to hurt back, but I wouldn't be there to observe his reaction. So how would I know I'd hurt him?  And if I didn't know, how would that be satisfying? Not to mention in the few instances in life where I actually have hurt someone face-to-face, it was such a dreadful experience I certainly wouldn't want to repeat it, no matter how angry I was.

I've always played certain emotions pretty close to the vest. Part of it is the tiny fragment of Scandinavian-ness (-inity? –viousness?) that's survived theater, speech team and years of therapy, but mostly it's the conviction that if you reveal too much, you're giving the world the leverage to … get you. (OK, so maybe he wasn't the only one who was hypervigilant and paranoid.) The point being, you go out in public with your neckline high enough, your hemline low enough, and your psychosis gagged and bound so you're not showing anyone anything you don't want them to see. And if you're going to go all "Fatal Attraction" on the guy who doesn't return your affection, in addition to incurring the wrath of the ASPCA, you may as well take out a full page ad in the New York Times saying "You broke my heart and I'm an Emotional Cripple."" VERY un-Minnesotan. Hugely embarrassing. And if he's already broken your heart, why give him more ammunition?

If you're not going to get any satisfaction from hurting this person (no matter how much your loyal friends insist he has it coming) and you don't want to give him any more evidence of how truly infatuated/hurt/unstable you really are, what's left?

If you're a graduate of Mrs. Van Zant's Humanities course (I, II or III), you know that the true interpretation of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" is not revenge. It means that if I take your eye … I must see for you. If I take your tooth … I must feed you. If I hurt you … I need to make it right.

So what obligation do I incur if I lash out at someone with the intent to hurt? I'm not sure … but I suspect I wouldn't like it.

Medea wasn't kidding when she said, "We must not think too much.  People go mad if they think too much."